Now, you can hover the mouse over that newly added label, see the mouse cursor change to a 'text bar' cursor type, and if you right click now you will get the display of nodes he also mentioned. op Data Label." If you select that one, you'll get the label on the node that the other answerer talked to you about. Among the options, I see something that says "Place. If you hover over the node with the red probe visible as the mouse cursor and then right click your mouse, you get an option list showing. Unfortunately, I don't have a mac, so I can't check it there.ĮDIT: You now have two very different methods to try out, given the other post here (at this time) on this! Great!ĮDIT AGAIN: On Windows, you can move your mouse over a wire and the pointer will change from a thin-lined cross to a red "probe" symbol. In the example you show where the current is added, the text is blue and uses even numbers (not precise ones with lots of digits.) Which means it is consistent with a text addition, like I described. You still can only get horizontal or vertical text in one form, each. But that only changes the anchor point around. For example, you can grab the text and use ctrl-E or ctrl-R to rotate or flip it around. You can mess around with things a little more than that. I just hit "t" to call up a text dialog box, enter "1mA" into the box, click on the "vertical text" check box if I want the text to be vertical, and then lay it down somewhere on the schematic. Seems easy enough to me, using the Windows version. So on the OSX version I can almost agree that the UI philosophy might have been taken one notch too far (where it could have easily been made more "beginner" friendly.) frequency, but I do not see a way to plot Vout/Vin in an AC sweep analysis. Vout/Vin (see Orcad Spice) I need to plot the overall gain vs. Allow the possibility to display equations, e.g. I have a few suggestions I consider would be very helpful if implemented: 1. But perhaps understandable when even finding the simulation menu escapes a lot of people. Im using EAGLE 8.4.3 to simulate an active circulator. The lack of OSX docs and understanding is probably why a lot of people seems to end up using Wine (or VBox) to run the Win version under OSX when it is really not necessary. It might not be as user friendly for noobs as the more graphical Win version but for (semi) professional work I actually find it more efficient. Apart from the above mentioned hard limitations and some missing shortcuts (like 'R', 'C' and so on) in the interest of consistency (I assume) I haven't come across any other real major limitations. I actually happen to like it since all menus are context based and you never have to search menus or move focus to a toolbar. Note: The OSX UI philosophy is radically different from the Win version and it is an acquired taste. measure spice command as in the Win version (Which is hard for other than "schoolbook examples") This is one of two cases I'm aware of where it is actually not currently possible to do something in the OSX version of LTSpice compared to just doing it in another way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |